Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
TBD
To Win
J. S. Nam
To Win
Unknown Player vs Ji Sung Nam Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our TBD vs Nam analysis and find out who is favored!
Upcoming Match
TBD VS Nam PREDICTION Clay
Meerbusch Challenger atp
- / Q3
ODDS
TBD Vs Nam Match Overview - When Will They Play?
Unknown Player takes on Ji Sung Nam in the ATP Meerbusch Challenger Men's Singles 2023 on . Our Expert betting tips are based on over 200,000 past match simulations. When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of TBD Vs Nam is now available here.
Unknown Player vs Ji Sung Nam Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: TBD 0 - 0 Nam
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), TBD has won 41.26% of points on their second serve, while Nam has won 45.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show TBD, in recent form, has won 50.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nam has won 49.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.5% and 32.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: TBD has saved 49.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nam has saved 52.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year TBD has won 24.87% of matches played (W/L 98/ 310), with Nam winning 48.28% (W/L 14/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: TBD has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 39% (W/L 24/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 79/ 170). Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 232/ 169), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, TBD has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 24.87% of matches (W/L 96/ 304), where as Nam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 13/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, TBD has played against opponents with an average rank of 35.35 while Nam has played against players with an average rank of 309.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, TBD has won 51% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nam has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player formance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below. Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, TBD has converted 39.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nam has converted 40.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
663
Rank
236
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
0% (0-0)
Career Total W/L
56% (279-215)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
45% (5-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$1,445
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Unknown Player vs Ji Sung Nam For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For TBD VS Nam
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Unknown Player | Ji Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 9% (24/247) | 33% (1/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 32% (774/1671) | 43% (12/16) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 39 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.5 |
| DFs Total | 104 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:54:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 46.4 | 116 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1112/1805) | 52% (49/95) |
| 1st Serve W% | 56% (620/1112) | 73% (36/49) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 37% (258/693) | 33% (15/46) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (49/132) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (596/1691) | 32% (24/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 1% (1/123) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 21% (3/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 4% (1/23) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (10/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (10/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 1% (115/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Unknown Player Recent Matches Played
Before:
view more
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ji Sung Nam
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Yunseong Chung
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Kaito Uesugi
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Shintaro Imai
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ji Sung Nam
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
122)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
112
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
TBD Vs Nam Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of TBD are available here and Nam photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
